您的位置:首页 > 汽车 > 新车 > 哪个平台打广告效果好_东营城乡建设局官网_百度平台联系方式_石家庄百度seo代理

哪个平台打广告效果好_东营城乡建设局官网_百度平台联系方式_石家庄百度seo代理

2025/1/8 7:56:29 来源:https://blog.csdn.net/zyl910/article/details/143928924  浏览:    关键词:哪个平台打广告效果好_东营城乡建设局官网_百度平台联系方式_石家庄百度seo代理
哪个平台打广告效果好_东营城乡建设局官网_百度平台联系方式_石家庄百度seo代理

在上一篇文章里,我们讲解了“Bgr24彩色位图转为Gray8灰度位图”算法。本文将探讨“Bgr24彩色位图转为灰度的Bgr24位图”。区别在于目标位图也是Bgr24格式的,只是将像素数据由彩色转为了灰度。这些算法也是跨平台的,同一份源代码,能在 X86及Arm架构上运行,且均享有SIMD硬件加速。

一、标量算法

1.1 算法实现

算法原理与上一篇文章是一样,唯一区别是目标位图的地址计算与写入处理。因为现在对于每一个像素,需要写入3个字节。
源代码如下。

public static unsafe void ScalarDoBatch(byte* pSrc, int strideSrc, int width, int height, byte* pDst, int strideDst) {const int cbPixel = 3; // Bgr24const int shiftPoint = 16;const int mulPoint = 1 << shiftPoint; // 0x10000const int mulRed = (int)(0.299 * mulPoint + 0.5); // 19595const int mulGreen = (int)(0.587 * mulPoint + 0.5); // 38470const int mulBlue = mulPoint - mulRed - mulGreen; // 7471byte* pRow = pSrc;byte* qRow = pDst;for (int i = 0; i < height; i++) {byte* p = pRow;byte* q = qRow;for (int j = 0; j < width; j++) {byte gray = (byte)((p[2] * mulRed + p[1] * mulGreen + p[0] * mulBlue) >> shiftPoint);q[0] = q[1] = q[2] = gray;p += cbPixel; // Bgr24q += cbPixel; // Bgr24 store grayscale.}pRow += strideSrc;qRow += strideDst;}
}

1.2 基准测试代码

使用 BenchmarkDotNet 进行基准测试。
可以使用上一篇文章的公共函数,写好标量算法的基准测试代码。源代码如下。

[Benchmark(Baseline = true)]
public void Scalar() {ScalarDo(_sourceBitmapData, _destinationBitmapData, 0);
}[Benchmark]
public void ScalarParallel() {ScalarDo(_sourceBitmapData, _destinationBitmapData, 1);
}public static unsafe void ScalarDo(BitmapData src, BitmapData dst, int parallelFactor = 0) {int width = src.Width;int height = src.Height;int strideSrc = src.Stride;int strideDst = dst.Stride;byte* pSrc = (byte*)src.Scan0.ToPointer();byte* pDst = (byte*)dst.Scan0.ToPointer();int processorCount = Environment.ProcessorCount;int batchSize = 0;if (parallelFactor > 1) {batchSize = height / (processorCount * parallelFactor);} else if (parallelFactor == 1) {if (height >= processorCount) batchSize = 1;}bool allowParallel = (batchSize > 0) && (processorCount > 1);if (allowParallel) {int batchCount = (height + batchSize - 1) / batchSize; // ceil((double)length / batchSize)Parallel.For(0, batchCount, i => {int start = batchSize * i;int len = batchSize;if (start + len > height) len = height - start;byte* pSrc2 = pSrc + start * strideSrc;byte* pDst2 = pDst + start * strideDst;ScalarDoBatch(pSrc2, strideSrc, width, len, pDst2, strideDst);});} else {ScalarDoBatch(pSrc, strideSrc, width, height, pDst, strideDst);}
}

二、向量算法

2.1 算法思路

对于24位转8位灰度,可以使用这种办法: 每次从源位图读取3个向量,进行3-元素组的解交织运算,得到 R,G,B 平面数据。随后使用向量化的乘法与加法,来计算灰度值。最后将存储了灰度值的那一个向量,进行3-元素组的交织运算,便能存储到目标位图。

它与“Bgr24彩色位图转为Gray8灰度位图”向量算法的区别,在于最后需做“3-元素组的交织运算”。

例如 Sse指令集使用的是128位向量,此时1个向量为16字节。每次从源位图读取3个向量,就是读取了48字节,即16个RGB像素。最后将灰度向量做“3-元素组的交织运算”,结果是3个向量。将那3个向量存储到目标位图,就是写入了48字节,即16个RGB像素。

对于3-元素组的交织,可以使用 shuffle 类别的指令来实现。例如对于X86架构的 128位向量,可以使用 SSSE3 的 _mm_shuffle_epi8 指令,它对应 NET 中的 Ssse3.Shuffle 方法。源代码如下。

static readonly Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_X_Part0 = Vector128.Create((sbyte)0, -1, -1, 1, -1, -1, 2, -1, -1, 3, -1, -1, 4, -1, -1, 5).AsByte();
static readonly Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_X_Part1 = Vector128.Create((sbyte)-1, 0, -1, -1, 1, -1, -1, 2, -1, -1, 3, -1, -1, 4, -1, -1).AsByte();
static readonly Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_X_Part2 = Vector128.Create((sbyte)-1, -1, 0, -1, -1, 1, -1, -1, 2, -1, -1, 3, -1, -1, 4, -1).AsByte();
static readonly Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Y_Part0 = Vector128.Create((sbyte)-1, -1, 6, -1, -1, 7, -1, -1, 8, -1, -1, 9, -1, -1, 10, -1).AsByte();
static readonly Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Y_Part1 = Vector128.Create((sbyte)5, -1, -1, 6, -1, -1, 7, -1, -1, 8, -1, -1, 9, -1, -1, 10).AsByte();
static readonly Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Y_Part2 = Vector128.Create((sbyte)-1, 5, -1, -1, 6, -1, -1, 7, -1, -1, 8, -1, -1, 9, -1, -1).AsByte();
static readonly Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Z_Part0 = Vector128.Create((sbyte)-1, 11, -1, -1, 12, -1, -1, 13, -1, -1, 14, -1, -1, 15, -1, -1).AsByte();
static readonly Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Z_Part1 = Vector128.Create((sbyte)-1, -1, 11, -1, -1, 12, -1, -1, 13, -1, -1, 14, -1, -1, 15, -1).AsByte();
static readonly Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Z_Part2 = Vector128.Create((sbyte)10, -1, -1, 11, -1, -1, 12, -1, -1, 13, -1, -1, 14, -1, -1, 15).AsByte();public static Vector128<byte> YGroup3Zip_Shuffle(Vector128<byte> x, Vector128<byte> y, Vector128<byte> z, out Vector128<byte> data1, out Vector128<byte> data2) {var f0A = YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_X_Part0;var f0B = YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_X_Part1;var f0C = YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_X_Part2;var f1A = YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Y_Part0;var f1B = YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Y_Part1;var f1C = YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Y_Part2;var f2A = YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Z_Part0;var f2B = YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Z_Part1;var f2C = YGroup3Zip_Shuffle_Byte_Z_Part2;var rt0 = Sse2.Or(Sse2.Or(Ssse3.Shuffle(x, f0A), Ssse3.Shuffle(y, f0B)), Ssse3.Shuffle(z, f0C));var rt1 = Sse2.Or(Sse2.Or(Ssse3.Shuffle(x, f1A), Ssse3.Shuffle(y, f1B)), Ssse3.Shuffle(z, f1C));var rt2 = Sse2.Or(Sse2.Or(Ssse3.Shuffle(x, f2A), Ssse3.Shuffle(y, f2B)), Ssse3.Shuffle(z, f2C));data1 = rt1;data2 = rt2;return rt0;
}

VectorTraits 库已经集成了上述算法,提供了“Vectors.YGroup3Zip”方法。该方法能够跨平台,它会使用各个平台的shuffle指令。

2.2 算法实现

有了 YGroup3Unzip、YGroup3Zip 方法后,便能方便的编写彩色转灰度的算法了。灰度系数有8位精度,于是需要将 8位数据变宽为16位后,再来计算乘法与加法。最后再将 16位数据,变窄为8位。源代码如下。

public static unsafe void UseVectorsDoBatch(byte* pSrc, int strideSrc, int width, int height, byte* pDst, int strideDst) {const int cbPixel = 3; // Bgr24const int shiftPoint = 8;const int mulPoint = 1 << shiftPoint; // 0x100const ushort mulRed = (ushort)(0.299 * mulPoint + 0.5); // 77const ushort mulGreen = (ushort)(0.587 * mulPoint + 0.5); // 150const ushort mulBlue = mulPoint - mulRed - mulGreen; // 29Vector<ushort> vmulRed = new Vector<ushort>(mulRed);Vector<ushort> vmulGreen = new Vector<ushort>(mulGreen);Vector<ushort> vmulBlue = new Vector<ushort>(mulBlue);int vectorWidth = Vector<byte>.Count;int maxX = width - vectorWidth;byte* pRow = pSrc;byte* qRow = pDst;for (int i = 0; i < height; i++) {Vector<byte>* pLast = (Vector<byte>*)(pRow + maxX * cbPixel); // Bgr24Vector<byte>* qLast = (Vector<byte>*)(qRow + maxX * cbPixel); // Bgr24 store grayscale.Vector<byte>* p = (Vector<byte>*)pRow;Vector<byte>* q = (Vector<byte>*)qRow;for (; ; ) {Vector<byte> r, g, b, gray, gray0, gray1, gray2;Vector<ushort> wr0, wr1, wg0, wg1, wb0, wb1;// Load.b = Vectors.YGroup3Unzip(p[0], p[1], p[2], out g, out r);// widen(r) * mulRed + widen(g) * mulGreen + widen(b) * mulBlueVector.Widen(r, out wr0, out wr1);Vector.Widen(g, out wg0, out wg1);Vector.Widen(b, out wb0, out wb1);wr0 = Vectors.Multiply(wr0, vmulRed);wr1 = Vectors.Multiply(wr1, vmulRed);wg0 = Vectors.Multiply(wg0, vmulGreen);wg1 = Vectors.Multiply(wg1, vmulGreen);wb0 = Vectors.Multiply(wb0, vmulBlue);wb1 = Vectors.Multiply(wb1, vmulBlue);wr0 = Vector.Add(wr0, wg0);wr1 = Vector.Add(wr1, wg1);wr0 = Vector.Add(wr0, wb0);wr1 = Vector.Add(wr1, wb1);// Shift right and narrow.wr0 = Vectors.ShiftRightLogical_Const(wr0, shiftPoint);wr1 = Vectors.ShiftRightLogical_Const(wr1, shiftPoint);gray = Vector.Narrow(wr0, wr1);// Store.gray0 = Vectors.YGroup3Zip(gray, gray, gray, out gray1, out gray2);q[0] = gray0;q[1] = gray1;q[2] = gray2;// Next.if (p >= pLast) break;p += cbPixel;q += cbPixel;if (p > pLast) p = pLast; // The last block is also use vector.if (q > qLast) q = qLast;}pRow += strideSrc;qRow += strideDst;}
}

2.3 基准测试代码

随后为该算法编写基准测试代码。

[Benchmark]
public void UseVectors() {UseVectorsDo(_sourceBitmapData, _destinationBitmapData, 0);
}[Benchmark]
public void UseVectorsParallel() {UseVectorsDo(_sourceBitmapData, _destinationBitmapData, 1);
}public static unsafe void UseVectorsDo(BitmapData src, BitmapData dst, int parallelFactor = 0) {int vectorWidth = Vector<byte>.Count;int width = src.Width;int height = src.Height;if (width <= vectorWidth) {ScalarDo(src, dst, parallelFactor);return;}int strideSrc = src.Stride;int strideDst = dst.Stride;byte* pSrc = (byte*)src.Scan0.ToPointer();byte* pDst = (byte*)dst.Scan0.ToPointer();int processorCount = Environment.ProcessorCount;int batchSize = 0;if (parallelFactor > 1) {batchSize = height / (processorCount * parallelFactor);} else if (parallelFactor == 1) {if (height >= processorCount) batchSize = 1;}bool allowParallel = (batchSize > 0) && (processorCount > 1);if (allowParallel) {int batchCount = (height + batchSize - 1) / batchSize; // ceil((double)length / batchSize)Parallel.For(0, batchCount, i => {int start = batchSize * i;int len = batchSize;if (start + len > height) len = height - start;byte* pSrc2 = pSrc + start * strideSrc;byte* pDst2 = pDst + start * strideDst;UseVectorsDoBatch(pSrc2, strideSrc, width, len, pDst2, strideDst);});} else {UseVectorsDoBatch(pSrc, strideSrc, width, height, pDst, strideDst);}
}

完整源码在 Bgr24ToGrayBgr24Benchmark.cs

三、基准测试结果

3.1 X86 架构

X86架构下的基准测试结果如下。

BenchmarkDotNet v0.14.0, Windows 11 (10.0.22631.4460/23H2/2023Update/SunValley3)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840H w/ Radeon 780M Graphics, 1 CPU, 16 logical and 8 physical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.403[Host]     : .NET 8.0.10 (8.0.1024.46610), X64 RyuJIT AVX-512F+CD+BW+DQ+VL+VBMIDefaultJob : .NET 8.0.10 (8.0.1024.46610), X64 RyuJIT AVX-512F+CD+BW+DQ+VL+VBMI| Method               | Width | Mean         | Error      | StdDev     | Ratio |
|--------------------- |------ |-------------:|-----------:|-----------:|------:|
| Scalar               | 1024  |  1,128.81 us |   4.436 us |   3.932 us |  1.00 |
| ScalarParallel       | 1024  |    157.96 us |   1.007 us |   0.942 us |  0.14 |
| UseVectors           | 1024  |    123.79 us |   1.144 us |   1.014 us |  0.11 |
| UseVectorsParallel   | 1024  |     26.05 us |   0.503 us |   0.471 us |  0.02 |
|                      |       |              |            |            |       |
| Scalar               | 2048  |  4,279.99 us |  37.658 us |  35.226 us |  1.00 |
| ScalarParallel       | 2048  |    622.01 us |   3.989 us |   3.537 us |  0.15 |
| UseVectors           | 2048  |    631.53 us |   6.741 us |   6.305 us |  0.15 |
| UseVectorsParallel   | 2048  |    330.47 us |   5.479 us |   4.857 us |  0.08 |
|                      |       |              |            |            |       |
| Scalar               | 4096  | 17,252.90 us | 106.215 us |  99.353 us |  1.00 |
| ScalarParallel       | 4096  |  3,743.78 us |  25.989 us |  24.310 us |  0.22 |
| UseVectors           | 4096  |  3,273.92 us |  32.645 us |  30.537 us |  0.19 |
| UseVectorsParallel   | 4096  |  3,746.83 us |  11.083 us |   9.255 us |  0.22 |
  • Scalar: 标量算法。
  • ScalarParallel: 并发的标量算法。
  • UseVectors: 矢量算法。
  • UseVectorsParallel: 并发的矢量算法。

3.2 Arm 架构

同样的源代码可以在 Arm 架构上运行。基准测试结果如下。

BenchmarkDotNet v0.14.0, macOS Sequoia 15.0.1 (24A348) [Darwin 24.0.0]
Apple M2, 1 CPU, 8 logical and 8 physical cores
.NET SDK 8.0.204[Host]     : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), Arm64 RyuJIT AdvSIMDDefaultJob : .NET 8.0.4 (8.0.424.16909), Arm64 RyuJIT AdvSIMD| Method               | Width | Mean         | Error      | StdDev     | Median       | Ratio | RatioSD |
|--------------------- |------ |-------------:|-----------:|-----------:|-------------:|------:|--------:|
| Scalar               | 1024  |    719.32 us |   0.215 us |   0.201 us |    719.34 us |  1.00 |    0.00 |
| ScalarParallel       | 1024  |    157.38 us |   1.423 us |   1.111 us |    157.25 us |  0.22 |    0.00 |
| UseVectors           | 1024  |    169.25 us |   0.538 us |   0.503 us |    169.40 us |  0.24 |    0.00 |
| UseVectorsParallel   | 1024  |     57.81 us |   0.998 us |   2.149 us |     58.11 us |  0.08 |    0.00 |
|                      |       |              |            |            |              |       |         |
| Scalar               | 2048  |  2,963.48 us |   6.674 us |   5.211 us |  2,961.39 us |  1.00 |    0.00 |
| ScalarParallel       | 2048  |    627.47 us |  11.680 us |  25.142 us |    616.63 us |  0.21 |    0.01 |
| UseVectors           | 2048  |    716.27 us |   2.097 us |   1.961 us |    717.02 us |  0.24 |    0.00 |
| UseVectorsParallel   | 2048  |    368.49 us |   7.320 us |  21.469 us |    378.95 us |  0.12 |    0.01 |
|                      |       |              |            |            |              |       |         |
| Scalar               | 4096  | 12,449.32 us | 177.868 us | 157.676 us | 12,508.13 us |  1.00 |    0.02 |
| ScalarParallel       | 4096  |  2,510.22 us |  34.541 us |  30.620 us |  2,501.37 us |  0.20 |    0.00 |
| UseVectors           | 4096  |  2,968.72 us |  20.503 us |  18.175 us |  2,965.71 us |  0.24 |    0.00 |
| UseVectorsParallel   | 4096  |  1,728.46 us |   4.362 us |   4.080 us |  1,729.00 us |  0.14 |    0.00 |

四、对算法进行检查

以往想对算法进行检查法时,直接对各个字节做相等比较就行了。
但“Bgr24彩色位图转为灰度的Bgr24位图”不适合那样的验证。由于整数运算有精度损失,造成部分像素值会有一些小的偏差。若直接对各个字节做相等比较,那么结果总是 false.
于是可以编写一个统计误差的函数。可通过误差的大小,来判断算法是否正确,以及比较算法的优劣。

private unsafe long SumDifference(BitmapData expected, BitmapData dst, out long countByteDifference, out int maxDifference) {const int cbPixel = 3; // Bgr24 store grayscale.long totalDifference = 0;countByteDifference = 0;maxDifference = 0;int maxPosX = -1, maxPosY = -1;int width = expected.Width;int height = expected.Height;int strideSrc = expected.Stride;int strideDst = dst.Stride;byte* pRow = (byte*)expected.Scan0.ToPointer();byte* qRow = (byte*)dst.Scan0.ToPointer();for (int i = 0; i < height; i++) {byte* p = pRow;byte* q = qRow;for (int j = 0; j < width; j++) {for (int k = 0; k < cbPixel; ++k) {int difference = Math.Abs((int)(*q) - *p);if (0 != difference) {totalDifference += difference;++countByteDifference;if (maxDifference < difference) {maxDifference = difference;maxPosX = j;maxPosY = i;}}++p;++q;}}pRow += strideSrc;qRow += strideDst;}if (maxDifference > 0) {//Console.WriteLine(string.Format("SumDifference maxDifference={0}, at ({1}, {2})", maxDifference, maxPosX, maxPosY));}return totalDifference;
}

在 Setup 方法里增加检查代码。

// Check.
bool allowCheck = true;
if (allowCheck) {try {TextWriter writer = Console.Out;long totalDifference, countByteDifference;int maxDifference;double averageDifference;long totalByte = Width * Height * 3;double percentDifference;// BaselineScalarDo(_sourceBitmapData, _expectedBitmapData);// ScalarParallelScalarParallel();totalDifference = SumDifference(_expectedBitmapData, _destinationBitmapData, out countByteDifference, out maxDifference);averageDifference = (countByteDifference > 0) ? (double)totalDifference / countByteDifference : 0;percentDifference = 100.0 * countByteDifference / totalByte;writer.WriteLine(string.Format("Difference of ScalarParallel: {0}/{1}={2}, max={3}, percentDifference={4:0.000000}%", totalDifference, countByteDifference, averageDifference, maxDifference, percentDifference));// UseVectorsUseVectors();totalDifference = SumDifference(_expectedBitmapData, _destinationBitmapData, out countByteDifference, out maxDifference);averageDifference = (countByteDifference > 0) ? (double)totalDifference / countByteDifference : 0;percentDifference = 100.0 * countByteDifference / totalByte;writer.WriteLine(string.Format("Difference of UseVectors: {0}/{1}={2}, max={3}, percentDifference={4:0.000000}%", totalDifference, countByteDifference, averageDifference, maxDifference, percentDifference));// UseVectorsParallelUseVectorsParallel();totalDifference = SumDifference(_expectedBitmapData, _destinationBitmapData, out countByteDifference, out maxDifference);averageDifference = (countByteDifference > 0) ? (double)totalDifference / countByteDifference : 0;percentDifference = 100.0 * countByteDifference / totalByte;writer.WriteLine(string.Format("Difference of UseVectorsParallel: {0}/{1}={2}, max={3}, percentDifference={4:0.000000}%", totalDifference, countByteDifference, averageDifference, maxDifference, percentDifference));} catch (Exception ex) {Debug.WriteLine(ex.ToString());}
}

字段说明:

  • totalDifference: 所有像素误差值总和。
  • countByteDifference: 发生误差的字节总数。
  • averageDifference: 平均每个字节的误差值。越小越好。
  • maxDifference: 最大误差值。即输出信息里的“max”。0表示完全匹配,12是正常,34表示误差较大,超过5一般是算法存在问题。
  • percentDifference: 发生误差的字节总数,在整个图片中的比例。越小越好。

运行程序,可以看到相关的输出信息。

Difference of ScalarParallel: 0/0=0, max=0, percentDifference=0.000000%
Difference of UseVectors: 422400/422400=1, max=1, percentDifference=13.427734%
Difference of UseVectorsParallel: 422400/422400=1, max=1, percentDifference=13.427734%

“max”最大为“1”,表示字节的最大误差只有1。整数算法本身是存在舍入误差的,而现在只有1,表示误差已经控制的很好了,算法的质量很高了。

附录

  • 完整源代码: https://github.com/zyl910/VectorTraits.Sample.Benchmarks/blob/main/VectorTraits.Sample.Benchmarks.Inc/Image/Bgr24ToGrayBgr24Benchmark.cs
  • YGroup3Unzip 的文档: https://zyl910.github.io/VectorTraits_doc/api/Zyl.VectorTraits.Vectors.YGroup3Unzip.html
  • YGroup3Zip 的文档: https://zyl910.github.io/VectorTraits_doc/api/Zyl.VectorTraits.Vectors.YGroup3Zip.html
  • VectorTraits 的NuGet包: https://www.nuget.org/packages/VectorTraits
  • VectorTraits 的在线文档: https://zyl910.github.io/VectorTraits_doc/
  • VectorTraits 源代码: https://github.com/zyl910/VectorTraits

版权声明:

本网仅为发布的内容提供存储空间,不对发表、转载的内容提供任何形式的保证。凡本网注明“来源:XXX网络”的作品,均转载自其它媒体,著作权归作者所有,商业转载请联系作者获得授权,非商业转载请注明出处。

我们尊重并感谢每一位作者,均已注明文章来源和作者。如因作品内容、版权或其它问题,请及时与我们联系,联系邮箱:809451989@qq.com,投稿邮箱:809451989@qq.com