建筑代理公司是干什么的_物业管理系统功能模块_seo关键词优化经验技巧_seo优化推广软件

🍨 本文为🔗365天深度学习训练营中的学习记录博客
🍖 原作者：K同学啊
文章目录
- 1、bug
- 2、模型构建
- - 1、数据处理
  - - 1、导入库
    - 2、查看数据目录
    - 3、加载数据
    - 4、数据展示
  - 2、内存优化
  - 3、模型构建
  - 4、模型训练
  - - 1、超参数设置
    - 2、模型训练
  - 5、结果展示
  - 6、图片预测
  - 7、尝试优化

1、bug

🤔 思路：

首先采用：tf.keras.losses.BinaryCrossentropy(from_logits=False)，作为激活函数，但是没有在修改输出层，对于二分类问题来说，输出层这个时候应该变成1个神经元，并且最后一层采用sigmoid激活函数，但是，但是🔲，我没有改，输出层依然是2个神经元，导致我的准确率一直上不去，一直在0.6只有徘徊，后面换了不少神经网络模型😢😢😢😢，最后才发现激活函数用错了，激活函数换成处理多分类tf.keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True)就可以了:happy::happy::happy::happy:。

📖 积累：

tf.keras.losses.BinaryCrossentropy

tf.keras.losses.BinaryCrossentropy(from_logits=False) 是 TensorFlow 中用于二分类任务的损失函数。这个损失函数计算的是二元交叉熵损失，它是衡量模型预测的概率分布与真实标签之间的差异的一种方式。

from_logits=False

：
- 默认值：False
- 含义：表示模型的输出已经经过了激活函数（如 sigmoid），即输出是概率值（范围在 0 到 1 之间）。
- 作用：在这种情况下，损失函数直接使用模型的输出值来计算二元交叉熵损失。

二元交叉熵公式

当 from_logits=False 时，二元交叉熵损失的计算公式为：

loss=−(y⋅log⁡§+(1−y)⋅log⁡(1−p))loss=−(y⋅log(p)+(1−y)⋅log(1−p))

其中：

yy 是真实的标签（0 或 1）。
pp 是模型的预测概率（范围在 0 到 1 之间）。

tf.keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy

tf.keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True) 是 TensorFlow 中用于多分类任务的损失函数。这个损失函数计算的是稀疏分类交叉熵损失，适用于标签为整数的情况（而不是 one-hot 编码）。

参数解释

from_logits=True：
- 默认值：False
- 含义：表示模型的输出是没有经过激活函数的原始值（即 logits）。
- 作用：在这种情况下，损失函数内部会先对输出值应用 softmax 激活函数，然后再计算分类交叉熵损失。

分类交叉熵公式

当 from_logits=True 时，分类交叉熵损失的计算公式为：

$\text{loss} = -\sum_{i} y_i \log(\text{softmax}(z_i))$

其中：

$y_i$ 是真实的标签（整数，表示类别索引）。
$z_i$ 是模型的输出值（logits，未经过激活函数）。
$\text{softmax}(z_i)$ 是经过 softmax 激活函数后的概率分布。

分类交叉熵损失

是一种常用的损失函数，特别适用于多分类任务。它用于衡量模型预测的概率分布与真实标签之间的差异。

2、模型构建

1、数据处理

1、导入库

import tensorflow as tf 
from tensorflow.keras import datasets, models, layers 
import numpy as np # 查看是否支持gpu
gpus = tf.config.list_physical_devices("GPU")if gpus:gpu0 = gpus[0] #如果有多个GPU，仅使用第0个GPUtf.config.experimental.set_memory_growth(gpu0, True) #设置GPU显存用量按需使用tf.config.set_visible_devices([gpu0],"GPU")gpus

输出：

[PhysicalDevice(name='/physical_device:GPU:0', device_type='GPU')]

2、查看数据目录

import os, PIL, pathlib data_dir = './data/'
data_dir = pathlib.Path(data_dir)  # 转化成 pathlib 对象data_paths = data_dir.glob('*')  # 获取对象下的文件
classnames = [str(path).split('/')[1] for path in data_paths]
classnames

输出：

['Monkeypox', 'Others']

3、加载数据

batch_size = 32 
heights = 224
widths = 224 # 训练集
train_ds = tf.keras.preprocessing.image_dataset_from_directory('./data/',validation_split=0.2,batch_size=batch_size,image_size=(widths, heights),subset='training',seed=42,shuffle=True
)# 验证集
val_ds = tf.keras.preprocessing.image_dataset_from_directory('./data/',validation_split=0.2,batch_size=batch_size,image_size=(widths, heights),subset='validation',seed=42,shuffle=True
)

Found 2142 files belonging to 2 classes.
Using 1714 files for training.
Found 2142 files belonging to 2 classes.
Using 428 files for validation.

4、数据展示

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt plt.figure(figsize=(20, 10))
for images, labels in train_ds.take(1):for i in range(20):plt.subplot(5, 10, i + 1)plt.imshow(images[i].numpy().astype('uint8'))plt.title(classnames[labels[i]])plt.axis('off')

在这里插入图片描述

# 查看数据格式
for images, labels in train_ds:print('(C, N, H, W): ',images.shape)print('class_labels: ', labels)break

(C, N, H, W):  (32, 224, 224, 3)
class_labels:  tf.Tensor([0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1], shape=(32,), dtype=int32)

2、内存优化

from tensorflow.data.experimental import AUTOTUNEAUTOTUNE = tf.data.experimental.AUTOTUNEtrain_ds = train_ds.cache().shuffle(1000).prefetch(buffer_size=AUTOTUNE)
vals_ds = val_ds.cache().prefetch(buffer_size=AUTOTUNE)

3、模型构建

model = models.Sequential([layers.experimental.preprocessing.Rescaling(1./255, input_shape=(heights, widths, 3)),layers.Conv2D(16, (3, 3), activation='relu', input_shape=(heights, widths, 3)), # 卷积层1，卷积核3*3  layers.AveragePooling2D((2, 2)),               # 池化层1，2*2采样layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu'),  # 卷积层2，卷积核3*3layers.AveragePooling2D((2, 2)),               # 池化层2，2*2采样layers.Dropout(0.3),  layers.Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'),  # 卷积层3，卷积核3*3layers.Dropout(0.3),  layers.Flatten(),                       # Flatten层，连接卷积层与全连接层layers.Dense(128, activation='relu'),   # 全连接层，特征进一步提取layers.Dense(len(classnames))               # 输出层，输出预期结果
])model.summary()  # 打印网络结构

Model: "sequential_1"
_________________________________________________________________Layer (type)                Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================rescaling_1 (Rescaling)     (None, 224, 224, 3)       0         conv2d_3 (Conv2D)           (None, 222, 222, 16)      448       average_pooling2d_2 (Averag  (None, 111, 111, 16)     0         ePooling2D)                                                     conv2d_4 (Conv2D)           (None, 109, 109, 32)      4640      average_pooling2d_3 (Averag  (None, 54, 54, 32)       0         ePooling2D)                                                     dropout_2 (Dropout)         (None, 54, 54, 32)        0         conv2d_5 (Conv2D)           (None, 52, 52, 64)        18496     dropout_3 (Dropout)         (None, 52, 52, 64)        0         flatten_1 (Flatten)         (None, 173056)            0         dense_2 (Dense)             (None, 128)               22151296  dense_3 (Dense)             (None, 2)                 258       =================================================================
Total params: 22,175,138
Trainable params: 22,175,138
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

4、模型训练

1、超参数设置

# 学习率
opt = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=1e-4)model.compile(optimizer=opt,loss=tf.keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True),  # 二分类任务metrics=['accuracy']  # 准确率
)

2、模型训练

from tensorflow.keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpointepochs = 50checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint('best_model.h5',monitor='val_accuracy',verbose=1,save_best_only=True,save_weights_only=True)result = model.fit(x=train_ds,validation_data=vals_ds,epochs=epochs,batch_size=batch_size,callbacks=[checkpointer]   # 回调函数，保存最好模型
)

Epoch 1/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.7122 - accuracy: 0.5418
Epoch 1: val_accuracy improved from -inf to 0.60280, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 4s 38ms/step - loss: 0.7114 - accuracy: 0.5420 - val_loss: 0.6610 - val_accuracy: 0.6028
Epoch 2/50
54/54 [==============================] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.6555 - accuracy: 0.6429
Epoch 2: val_accuracy improved from 0.60280 to 0.61449, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 3s 65ms/step - loss: 0.6555 - accuracy: 0.6429 - val_loss: 0.6723 - val_accuracy: 0.6145
Epoch 3/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.6227 - accuracy: 0.6736
Epoch 3: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.61449
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 24ms/step - loss: 0.6238 - accuracy: 0.6727 - val_loss: 0.7243 - val_accuracy: 0.6145
Epoch 4/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.5910 - accuracy: 0.6813
Epoch 4: val_accuracy improved from 0.61449 to 0.63785, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 32ms/step - loss: 0.5907 - accuracy: 0.6820 - val_loss: 0.6972 - val_accuracy: 0.6379
Epoch 5/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.6150 - accuracy: 0.6618
Epoch 5: val_accuracy improved from 0.63785 to 0.65421, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 30ms/step - loss: 0.6157 - accuracy: 0.6622 - val_loss: 0.6427 - val_accuracy: 0.6542
Epoch 6/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.5473 - accuracy: 0.7200
Epoch 6: val_accuracy improved from 0.65421 to 0.67523, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 29ms/step - loss: 0.5468 - accuracy: 0.7205 - val_loss: 0.6319 - val_accuracy: 0.6752
Epoch 7/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.5197 - accuracy: 0.7412
Epoch 7: val_accuracy improved from 0.67523 to 0.68458, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 30ms/step - loss: 0.5226 - accuracy: 0.7363 - val_loss: 0.5572 - val_accuracy: 0.6846
Epoch 8/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.5101 - accuracy: 0.7384
Epoch 8: val_accuracy improved from 0.68458 to 0.68925, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 32ms/step - loss: 0.5118 - accuracy: 0.7375 - val_loss: 0.6184 - val_accuracy: 0.6893
Epoch 9/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.4747 - accuracy: 0.7679
Epoch 9: val_accuracy improved from 0.68925 to 0.78037, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 30ms/step - loss: 0.4743 - accuracy: 0.7695 - val_loss: 0.4770 - val_accuracy: 0.7804
Epoch 10/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.4504 - accuracy: 0.7895
Epoch 10: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.78037
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 22ms/step - loss: 0.4528 - accuracy: 0.7870 - val_loss: 0.4698 - val_accuracy: 0.7640
Epoch 11/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.4583 - accuracy: 0.7753
Epoch 11: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.78037
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 24ms/step - loss: 0.4571 - accuracy: 0.7760 - val_loss: 0.4528 - val_accuracy: 0.7734
Epoch 12/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.4225 - accuracy: 0.8044
Epoch 12: val_accuracy improved from 0.78037 to 0.79206, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 36ms/step - loss: 0.4219 - accuracy: 0.8057 - val_loss: 0.4540 - val_accuracy: 0.7921
Epoch 13/50
54/54 [==============================] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.4011 - accuracy: 0.8291
Epoch 13: val_accuracy improved from 0.79206 to 0.80140, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 3s 48ms/step - loss: 0.4011 - accuracy: 0.8291 - val_loss: 0.4250 - val_accuracy: 0.8014
Epoch 14/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.3779 - accuracy: 0.8339
Epoch 14: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.80140
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.3813 - accuracy: 0.8326 - val_loss: 0.4555 - val_accuracy: 0.7850
Epoch 15/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.3603 - accuracy: 0.8442
Epoch 15: val_accuracy improved from 0.80140 to 0.82944, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 30ms/step - loss: 0.3605 - accuracy: 0.8454 - val_loss: 0.3814 - val_accuracy: 0.8294
Epoch 16/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.3405 - accuracy: 0.8561
Epoch 16: val_accuracy improved from 0.82944 to 0.85047, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 28ms/step - loss: 0.3387 - accuracy: 0.8576 - val_loss: 0.3755 - val_accuracy: 0.8505
Epoch 17/50
54/54 [==============================] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.3223 - accuracy: 0.8658
Epoch 17: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.85047
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 22ms/step - loss: 0.3223 - accuracy: 0.8658 - val_loss: 0.4021 - val_accuracy: 0.8364
Epoch 18/50
54/54 [==============================] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.3203 - accuracy: 0.8611
Epoch 18: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.85047
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 24ms/step - loss: 0.3203 - accuracy: 0.8611 - val_loss: 0.3645 - val_accuracy: 0.8458
Epoch 19/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.3138 - accuracy: 0.8780
Epoch 19: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.85047
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 22ms/step - loss: 0.3111 - accuracy: 0.8792 - val_loss: 0.3717 - val_accuracy: 0.8505
Epoch 20/50
54/54 [==============================] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2977 - accuracy: 0.8810
Epoch 20: val_accuracy improved from 0.85047 to 0.86916, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 29ms/step - loss: 0.2977 - accuracy: 0.8810 - val_loss: 0.3575 - val_accuracy: 0.8692
Epoch 21/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2802 - accuracy: 0.8960
Epoch 21: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.86916
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.2775 - accuracy: 0.8979 - val_loss: 0.3989 - val_accuracy: 0.8505
Epoch 22/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2712 - accuracy: 0.9012
Epoch 22: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.86916
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.2691 - accuracy: 0.9020 - val_loss: 0.4104 - val_accuracy: 0.8248
Epoch 23/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2792 - accuracy: 0.8930
Epoch 23: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.86916
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 22ms/step - loss: 0.2763 - accuracy: 0.8950 - val_loss: 0.3594 - val_accuracy: 0.8668
Epoch 24/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2571 - accuracy: 0.9000
Epoch 24: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.86916
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 24ms/step - loss: 0.2557 - accuracy: 0.9008 - val_loss: 0.3951 - val_accuracy: 0.8318
Epoch 25/50
54/54 [==============================] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2302 - accuracy: 0.9137
Epoch 25: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.86916
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 28ms/step - loss: 0.2302 - accuracy: 0.9137 - val_loss: 0.3504 - val_accuracy: 0.8692
Epoch 26/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2428 - accuracy: 0.9132
Epoch 26: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.86916
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 32ms/step - loss: 0.2410 - accuracy: 0.9137 - val_loss: 0.4068 - val_accuracy: 0.8505
Epoch 27/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2375 - accuracy: 0.9078
Epoch 27: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.86916
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 24ms/step - loss: 0.2353 - accuracy: 0.9090 - val_loss: 0.3579 - val_accuracy: 0.8668
Epoch 28/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2171 - accuracy: 0.9257
Epoch 28: val_accuracy improved from 0.86916 to 0.88551, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 38ms/step - loss: 0.2174 - accuracy: 0.9247 - val_loss: 0.3274 - val_accuracy: 0.8855
Epoch 29/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2106 - accuracy: 0.9233
Epoch 29: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.88551
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.2109 - accuracy: 0.9230 - val_loss: 0.3738 - val_accuracy: 0.8715
Epoch 30/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2144 - accuracy: 0.9251
Epoch 30: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.88551
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 22ms/step - loss: 0.2170 - accuracy: 0.9236 - val_loss: 0.3435 - val_accuracy: 0.8808
Epoch 31/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1972 - accuracy: 0.9376
Epoch 31: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.88551
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.1988 - accuracy: 0.9352 - val_loss: 0.3614 - val_accuracy: 0.8738
Epoch 32/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1830 - accuracy: 0.9352
Epoch 32: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.88551
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.1833 - accuracy: 0.9341 - val_loss: 0.3529 - val_accuracy: 0.8808
Epoch 33/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1834 - accuracy: 0.9315
Epoch 33: val_accuracy improved from 0.88551 to 0.89019, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 30ms/step - loss: 0.1845 - accuracy: 0.9306 - val_loss: 0.3385 - val_accuracy: 0.8902
Epoch 34/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1749 - accuracy: 0.9370
Epoch 34: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89019
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.1786 - accuracy: 0.9358 - val_loss: 0.3647 - val_accuracy: 0.8855
Epoch 35/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1767 - accuracy: 0.9358
Epoch 35: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89019
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.1764 - accuracy: 0.9358 - val_loss: 0.3402 - val_accuracy: 0.8855
Epoch 36/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1593 - accuracy: 0.9442
Epoch 36: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89019
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.1614 - accuracy: 0.9434 - val_loss: 0.3344 - val_accuracy: 0.8879
Epoch 37/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1565 - accuracy: 0.9370
Epoch 37: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89019
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 22ms/step - loss: 0.1590 - accuracy: 0.9370 - val_loss: 0.4124 - val_accuracy: 0.8785
Epoch 38/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1798 - accuracy: 0.9293
Epoch 38: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89019
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 22ms/step - loss: 0.1816 - accuracy: 0.9277 - val_loss: 0.3567 - val_accuracy: 0.8762
Epoch 39/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1399 - accuracy: 0.9590
Epoch 39: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89019
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.1445 - accuracy: 0.9551 - val_loss: 0.3856 - val_accuracy: 0.8832
Epoch 40/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1514 - accuracy: 0.9479
Epoch 40: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89019
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.1507 - accuracy: 0.9487 - val_loss: 0.3333 - val_accuracy: 0.8879
Epoch 41/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1339 - accuracy: 0.9564
Epoch 41: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89019
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.1322 - accuracy: 0.9562 - val_loss: 0.3422 - val_accuracy: 0.8832
Epoch 42/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1304 - accuracy: 0.9539
Epoch 42: val_accuracy improved from 0.89019 to 0.89252, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 30ms/step - loss: 0.1350 - accuracy: 0.9522 - val_loss: 0.3840 - val_accuracy: 0.8925
Epoch 43/50
54/54 [==============================] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1250 - accuracy: 0.9580
Epoch 43: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89252
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 37ms/step - loss: 0.1250 - accuracy: 0.9580 - val_loss: 0.4118 - val_accuracy: 0.8832
Epoch 44/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1283 - accuracy: 0.9518
Epoch 44: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89252
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 33ms/step - loss: 0.1293 - accuracy: 0.9504 - val_loss: 0.4486 - val_accuracy: 0.8668
Epoch 45/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1331 - accuracy: 0.9548
Epoch 45: val_accuracy improved from 0.89252 to 0.89486, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 33ms/step - loss: 0.1337 - accuracy: 0.9545 - val_loss: 0.3383 - val_accuracy: 0.8949
Epoch 46/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1126 - accuracy: 0.9655
Epoch 46: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89486
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 22ms/step - loss: 0.1125 - accuracy: 0.9650 - val_loss: 0.3808 - val_accuracy: 0.8832
Epoch 47/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1270 - accuracy: 0.9576
Epoch 47: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89486
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.1263 - accuracy: 0.9574 - val_loss: 0.3838 - val_accuracy: 0.8808
Epoch 48/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0988 - accuracy: 0.9642
Epoch 48: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89486
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 22ms/step - loss: 0.0987 - accuracy: 0.9638 - val_loss: 0.3463 - val_accuracy: 0.8925
Epoch 49/50
52/54 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1000 - accuracy: 0.9697
Epoch 49: val_accuracy did not improve from 0.89486
54/54 [==============================] - 1s 23ms/step - loss: 0.0979 - accuracy: 0.9702 - val_loss: 0.3449 - val_accuracy: 0.8855
Epoch 50/50
53/54 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0835 - accuracy: 0.9703
Epoch 50: val_accuracy improved from 0.89486 to 0.89720, saving model to best_model.h5
54/54 [==============================] - 2s 31ms/step - loss: 0.0863 - accuracy: 0.9697 - val_loss: 0.3432 - val_accuracy: 0.8972

5、结果展示

acc = result.history['accuracy']
val_acc = result.history['val_accuracy']loss = result.history['loss']
val_loss = result.history['val_loss']epochs_range = range(epochs)plt.figure(figsize=(12, 4))
plt.subplot(1, 2, 1)
plt.plot(epochs_range, acc, label='Training Accuracy')
plt.plot(epochs_range, val_acc, label='Validation Accuracy')
plt.legend(loc='lower right')
plt.title('Training and Validation Accuracy')plt.subplot(1, 2, 2)
plt.plot(epochs_range, loss, label='Training Loss')
plt.plot(epochs_range, val_loss, label='Validation Loss')
plt.legend(loc='upper right')
plt.title('Training and Validation Loss')
plt.show()

在这里插入图片描述

6、图片预测

# 加载最佳模型
model.load_weights('best_model.h5')

# 选一个图片预测
from PIL import Image
import numpy as npimg = Image.open("./data/Monkeypox/M01_02_11.jpg")  #这里选择你需要预测的图片
plt.imshow(img)
image = tf.image.resize(img, [heights, widths])img_array = tf.expand_dims(image, 0) predictions = model.predict(img_array) # 这里选用你已经训练好的模型
print("预测结果为：",classnames[np.argmax(predictions)])

1/1 [==============================] - 0s 30ms/step
预测结果为： Monkeypox

在这里插入图片描述

7、尝试优化

🤔 思路：添加正则化层，代码如下：

num_classes = 2model = models.Sequential([layers.experimental.preprocessing.Rescaling(1./255, input_shape=(heights, widths, 3)),layers.Conv2D(16, (3, 3), activation='relu', input_shape=(heights, widths, 3)), # 卷积层1，卷积核3*3  layers.BatchNormalization(),layers.AveragePooling2D((2, 2)),               # 池化层1，2*2采样layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu'),  # 卷积层2，卷积核3*3layers.BatchNormalization(),layers.AveragePooling2D((2, 2)),               # 池化层2，2*2采样layers.Dropout(0.3),  layers.Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'),  # 卷积层3，卷积核3*3layers.BatchNormalization(),layers.Dropout(0.3),  layers.Flatten(),                       # Flatten层，连接卷积层与全连接层layers.Dense(128, activation='relu'),   # 全连接层，特征进一步提取layers.Dense(num_classes)               # 输出层，输出预期结果
])model.summary()  # 打印网络结构

🤞 结果：训练集确实准确率更快提升，但是验证集没有，所以总的来说没有什么太大的变化，损失率反而提升了，效果反而变差了。

提示：这张图片不知道为什么上传不了，大家可以换成这个代码试一下，看一下结果

建筑代理公司是干什么的_物业管理系统功能模块_seo关键词优化经验技巧_seo优化推广软件

文章目录

1、bug

2、模型构建

1、数据处理

1、导入库

2、查看数据目录

3、加载数据

4、数据展示

2、内存优化

3、模型构建

4、模型训练

1、超参数设置

2、模型训练

5、结果展示

6、图片预测

7、尝试优化

最新新闻

热搜词